|
|
|
A Happy Nation12/30/2006 - 01:35 / Anonimous
But what’s the number of those who were strongly against the regime? Let’s assume that there were 15 to 20 thousand people protesting on the main square and about 30 to 40 thousand being too afraid to come and participate. Altogether we have at best 60 thousand people who were truly for changes in a country with a population of 9 million. Analyzing different reports on that election we may assume that 30 to 40 percent of population wanted a new president. I wouldn’t mix these two categories of people because the latter could have motives of quite different matter and duration. What can we say about other 60 to 70 percent of population? Who are they? I’m inclined to think now that they feel as masters in this long-suffering country. Isn’t it really so? Belarusian prols live now in a unique country which is totally corresponding to their needs. However it is the system itself to form these needs but in our case it is not very important. It is obvious to recall he words of a French ambassador in USSR: “They are so happy that they can’t actually imagine how bad their life is”. It is true. The standard of living and the quality of lifestyle can be valued only through comparison. Without visa Belarusians can go only to Russia and Ukraine. When looking at ruinous pavements and closed factories in Russian and Ukrainian province one gives odds to tidy Belarus. However, to see much better quality of goods and services in EU-bottom Poland and Lithuania a Belarusian has to have a sweat to get it. Will prols do this? Why should they? They already know from Belarusian propaganda that things are going much worse in these countries. On the other hand, what can democratic forces give them? Ladies and gentlemen, we shouldn’t associate nowadays Belarus with Soviet Byelorussia. We have a quite different state system here and we use old terms just for convenience. Fathers of October revolution descended from intellectuals’ families. They destroyed all churches and tried to sublimate religion with something else but they donated yet Soviet but still culture. Just recall the Soviet theatre, literature, art. When my parents were young, all shops were full of affordable classic literature. It was in vogue to have big home libraries; it was in vogue to read… Our current state system of values is much nearer and dearer to prols. It’s not nice to get good grades at school anymore. Why should anyone study hard to become a poor engineer when he can become a prosperous policeman without any descent education? In USSR it was common to think that all people are equal but still there was an unofficial social distance. For example, in 50s’ officials wore hats and workers wore caps and so on. But today it’s enough to listen to any of Lukashenka’s speeches to understand: there’s no any verge between supreme power and, say, some countryside tractor driver who has never left his home village. So the question is not “What can we offer to prols?” but “How can we survive in this alien and all-sufficient country?” However, I exaggerate a bit a verge between different sectors of society. Despite of everything our society is developing and all utopian regimes tend to play out. What’s the “half-life” of current Belarusian regime, 10 years or 100? Only future can tell. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Post new comment